-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 254
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Execution branch coverage report #4755
Merged
robin-aws
merged 17 commits into
dafny-lang:master
from
robin-aws:runtime-coverage-report
Nov 9, 2023
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a70859f
Slightly hacky working first pass
robin-aws 4bc558f
Rename existing —coverage-report to —verification-coverage-report
robin-aws b1254a4
Improve coverage report formatting, hook up to stdlibs, start to impr…
robin-aws fb55df8
Integration test mostly working
robin-aws 99ff54b
Fix regression in report naming
robin-aws b1f5da6
Revert runtime change
robin-aws 084f928
Nonuniform test
robin-aws ed93db2
Fix paths in expect file
robin-aws 46d7331
Test for unsupported feature too
robin-aws 6f2a5d4
Mention —coverage-report for dafny test
robin-aws b0b7fc5
Update features table
robin-aws e40be50
Improve encapsulation
robin-aws 06a9068
Release note, typo, whitespace
robin-aws 87aa068
Typo and library backend
robin-aws 55616a1
Merge branch 'master' into runtime-coverage-report
robin-aws 9262299
Fix feature support table
robin-aws 64ac12d
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/dafny-lang/dafny into run…
robin-aws File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Improve encapsulation
- Loading branch information
commit e40be50f48843706f65290ec00c2d4b2245abf6d
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is nice because then merging actual and expected coverage would work well. The
merge-coverage-reports
command could perhaps use a--diff
flag that would produce a report indicating where two coverage reports differed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My thoughts exactly, and although I do suspect that the actual and expected coverage don't 100% agree on coverable things yet, I don't think it will take much to align them in the future.