Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature request: for loops #7

Closed
calder opened this issue Jul 6, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

feature request: for loops #7

calder opened this issue Jul 6, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
kind: enhancement Enhancements, feature requests, etc. These are NOT bugs, but ways we can improve Dafny

Comments

@calder
Copy link

calder commented Jul 6, 2016

Are there any technological or ideological reasons for not supporting for loops in Dafny?

@calder calder changed the title for loops feature request: for loops Jul 6, 2016
@parno parno added the kind: enhancement Enhancements, feature requests, etc. These are NOT bugs, but ways we can improve Dafny label Sep 16, 2016
utaal pushed a commit to utaal/dafny that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2020
…o-vector

implement DafnyArray without a vector to avoid an extra pointer indir…
@acioc
Copy link
Collaborator

acioc commented Jul 8, 2020

Currently closing since this behavior can be handled via the Dafny while. @RustanLeino if there are larger ideological reasons for additionally supporting for.

@acioc acioc closed this as completed Jul 8, 2020
@RustanLeino
Copy link
Collaborator

See RFC dafny-lang/rfcs#4

camrein added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 8, 2021
Move the tests into the Microsoft.Dafny.LanguageServer namespace.
prvshah51 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 17, 2021
Co-authored-by: Robin Salkeld <[email protected]>
atomb pushed a commit to atomb/dafny that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind: enhancement Enhancements, feature requests, etc. These are NOT bugs, but ways we can improve Dafny
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants