Major Cleanup #82
Major Cleanup #82
Conversation
remove f interpolation (unnecessary)
add/remove reaction, created get_conversation_id
self.banner typed twice created_at_datetime cast to str
UserUnavailable was not in errors. Added Removed the multiple response = and just returned
Moved tweet to top and moved reply parsing into the profile-conversation loop
Also add missing community from Tweet
WalkthroughThe update encompasses a comprehensive overhaul of the Python project, focusing on refining configurations, readability, and error management. Noteworthy changes include enhanced file exclusion rules in Changes
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (2)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Additional Context UsedRuff (3)
Additional comments not posted (9)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
I did not touch the async portion of the script... |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (3)
twikit/community.py (2)
120-146: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [141-170]
The
get_tweetsmethod's documentation should reflect the use ofTweetTypeenum for thetweet_typeparameter.
187-193: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [190-204]
Consider adding error handling or a fallback mechanism in
get_membersto manage potential failures in external calls.twikit/user.py (1)
132-138: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [135-158]
Update the documentation for
get_tweetsto accurately describe the use ofUserTweetType.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Also fix circular import
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (7)
twikit/http.py (1)
Line range hint
24-24: Replace magic number400with a constant for better readability and maintainability.+ HTTP_BAD_REQUEST = 400 - if status_code >= 400: + if status_code >= HTTP_BAD_REQUEST:twikit/utils.py (6)
6-6: Ensure consistent spacing in import statements for better readability.
256-257: Consider using a single line for URL definitions when they fit within the line length limit to maintain consistency and readability.
Line range hint
310-310: The constructor of theResultclass has too many parameters. Consider refactoring to improve maintainability.
Line range hint
505-505: UseX | Yinisinstancecalls instead of(X, Y)for better readability and consistency with modern Python practices.
Line range hint
506-506: Avoid overwriting theforloop variablevalueby the assignment target. This can lead to unexpected behavior and bugs.
Line range hint
536-536: Thebuild_queryfunction is too complex. Consider simplifying it or breaking it down into smaller functions to improve readability and maintainability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (2)
twikit/tweet.py (1)
Line range hint
138-199: The__init__method of theTweetclass is complex and lengthy. Consider refactoring to improve readability and maintainability.twikit/utils.py (1)
Line range hint
536-634: Thebuild_queryfunction is complex and has many branches. Consider breaking it down into smaller functions or simplifying the logic.
| url: str, | ||
| **kwargs | ||
| ) -> httpx.Response: | ||
| async def request(self, method: str, url: str, **kwargs) -> httpx.Response: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add type annotations for **kwargs to improve code clarity and type safety.
Would you like me to add these annotations for you?
| raise BadRequestError(message, headers=response.headers) | ||
| elif status_code == 401: | ||
| raise Unauthorized(message, headers=response.headers) | ||
| raise UnauthorizedError(message, headers=response.headers) | ||
| elif status_code == 403: | ||
| raise Forbidden(message, headers=response.headers) | ||
| raise ForbiddenError(message, headers=response.headers) | ||
| elif status_code == 404: | ||
| raise NotFound(message, headers=response.headers) | ||
| raise NotFoundError(message, headers=response.headers) | ||
| elif status_code == 408: | ||
| raise RequestTimeout(message, headers=response.headers) | ||
| raise RequestTimeoutError(message, headers=response.headers) | ||
| elif status_code == 429: | ||
| raise TooManyRequests(message, headers=response.headers) | ||
| raise TooManyRequestsError(message, headers=response.headers) | ||
| elif 500 <= status_code < 600: | ||
| raise ServerError(message, headers=response.headers) | ||
| else: | ||
| raise TwitterException(message, headers=response.headers) | ||
| raise TwitterError(message, headers=response.headers) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider replacing magic numbers with named constants for HTTP status codes to improve code readability and maintainability.
- if status_code == 400:
+ if status_code == HTTPStatus.BAD_REQUEST:Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| raise BadRequestError(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| elif status_code == 401: | |
| raise Unauthorized(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| raise UnauthorizedError(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| elif status_code == 403: | |
| raise Forbidden(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| raise ForbiddenError(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| elif status_code == 404: | |
| raise NotFound(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| raise NotFoundError(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| elif status_code == 408: | |
| raise RequestTimeout(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| raise RequestTimeoutError(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| elif status_code == 429: | |
| raise TooManyRequests(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| raise TooManyRequestsError(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| elif 500 <= status_code < 600: | |
| raise ServerError(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| else: | |
| raise TwitterException(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| raise TwitterError(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| raise BadRequestError(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| elif status_code == 401: | |
| raise UnauthorizedError(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| elif status_code == 403: | |
| raise ForbiddenError(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| elif status_code == 404: | |
| raise NotFoundError(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| elif status_code == 408: | |
| raise RequestTimeoutError(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| elif status_code == 429: | |
| raise TooManyRequestsError(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| elif 500 <= status_code < 600: | |
| raise ServerError(message, headers=response.headers) | |
| else: | |
| raise TwitterError(message, headers=response.headers) |
|
@coderabbitai review |
1 similar comment
|
@coderabbitai review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (2)
twikit/utils.py (2)
Line range hint
310-310: The constructor of theResultclass has too many arguments. Consider refactoring to reduce the number of arguments, possibly by using a configuration object or additional methods for setting properties.
Line range hint
531-531: Thebuild_queryfunction is too complex. Consider refactoring to simplify the function, possibly by breaking it down into smaller helper functions.
|
@d60 Do we plan on merging these? If not, I'll close this and stop merging branches whenever you update. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (3)
twikit/utils.py (3)
6-6: Consider usingfrom __future__ import annotationsto enable postponed evaluation of type annotations, which can help avoid circular imports and other issues in complex projects.
Line range hint
311-311: The__init__method of theResultclass has too many arguments. Consider refactoring to reduce complexity and improve maintainability.- def __init__(self, results: list[T], fetch_next_result: Callable | None = None, next_cursor: str | None = None, fetch_previous_result: Callable | None = None, previous_cursor: str | None = None) -> None: + def __init__(self, results: list[T], fetch_next_result: Callable | None = None, cursor_info: dict[str, str | None]) -> None: + self.next_cursor = cursor_info.get('next_cursor') + self.previous_cursor = cursor_info.get('previous_cursor')
Line range hint
532-532: Thebuild_queryfunction is too complex and has too many branches. Consider refactoring to simplify the logic and improve readability.- def build_query(text: str, options: SearchOptions) -> str: + def build_query(text: str, options: SearchOptions) -> str: + # Refactor to separate concerns and simplify logic
I have tried to do the bare minimum of implementing the IDE portion.
But I did add the .gitignore and ruff editor options.
This will take a while to review, but it's worth it.
I found several possible typing situations that could cause problems, as well as getting rid of all the "Literals" and using enums.
Hopefully, it meets your coding objectives
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
rufftool inpyproject.tomlto enhance code formatting.twikitfor better exception management.twikitclasses with new attributes and improved method signatures for enhanced functionality and clarity.twikit/tweet.py.Bug Fixes
twikit/trend.pyandtwikit/tweet.pyto allowNonevalues.Refactor
twikitfor improved readability and maintainability.HTTPClientclass for better web session management.Documentation
.gitignoreto include rules for various development environments and files, ensuring cleaner repositories.