Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proof-of-concept to plumb function results to claims #5523

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

negz
Copy link
Member

@negz negz commented Mar 28, 2024

Description of your changes

Fixes #5402

I don't intend to finish this and get it merged. I'm just using this PR to sketch out a direction for @dalton-hill-0 to consider as part of #5450.

This implements the design we sketched out in #5426.

I have:

Need help with this checklist? See the cheat sheet.

negz added 4 commits May 31, 2024 18:19
It's probably useful to let function authors influence the reason of
events. We already let them influence the reason of conditions.

Signed-off-by: Nic Cope <[email protected]>
We'll add SDK helpers so folks can just write them directly

Signed-off-by: Nic Cope <[email protected]>
@negz
Copy link
Member Author

negz commented Jun 28, 2024

The real implementation was done in #5450. 😄

@negz negz closed this Jun 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Provide a Channel of Communication to the Claim
1 participant