Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix JUnit Tests #1359

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 23, 2024
Merged

Fix JUnit Tests #1359

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 23, 2024

Conversation

JPercival
Copy link
Contributor

As some point in the future we'd like to migrate all tests to JUnit. In the meantime, most of the tests are written using TestNG. The CI Server was not executing JUnit-based tests, causing a few regressions.

  • Migrated all Junit tests to TestNG
  • Fixed parameter ordering of relevant assertions

Copy link

Formatting check succeeded!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 62.26%. Comparing base (662ff61) to head (3c25cdf).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1359      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     62.90%   62.26%   -0.65%     
- Complexity     6144     6953     +809     
============================================
  Files           479      492      +13     
  Lines         25501    27732    +2231     
  Branches       4723     5506     +783     
============================================
+ Hits          16042    17267    +1225     
- Misses         7295     8202     +907     
- Partials       2164     2263      +99     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@JPercival JPercival enabled auto-merge (squash) April 23, 2024 19:12
@JPercival JPercival merged commit c4ceada into master Apr 23, 2024
5 checks passed
@JPercival JPercival deleted the fix-junit-tests-not-running branch April 23, 2024 19:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants