Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

netavark: add support for dns with internal #919

Merged

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented Feb 4, 2022

netavark + aardvark support this when we add a gateway ip to the config
so that aardvark can use this address to bind on it.
We only add the gateway when not internal or when dns is enabled. If
internal without dns we do not need the gw address.

netavark + aardvark support this when we add a gateway ip to the config
so that aardvark can use this address to bind on it.
We only add the gateway when not internal or when dns is enabled. If
internal without dns we do not need the gw address.

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 4, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Feb 4, 2022
@Luap99
Copy link
Member Author

Luap99 commented Feb 4, 2022

@lsm5 @baude @mheon PTAL

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Feb 4, 2022

LGTM

@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Feb 4, 2022

perfecto!
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Feb 4, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit cba555c into containers:main Feb 4, 2022
@Luap99 Luap99 deleted the netavark-internal-dns branch February 4, 2022 14:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants