Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Could you please share your paper? #1

Open
wypppp opened this issue May 21, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Could you please share your paper? #1

wypppp opened this issue May 21, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@wypppp
Copy link

wypppp commented May 21, 2021

Hello,
I am interested in your paper, so could you please share your paper?
Thanks!

@confiwent
Copy link
Owner

confiwent commented May 21, 2021 via email

@wypppp
Copy link
Author

wypppp commented May 22, 2021

Hi, thanks for your interests! Our paper has been accepted by NOSSDAV 2021, and will be published online within a few months. Attached is the accepted paper. Please let me know if you have any questions about the paper. Best regards, 阚诺文 Nuowen Kan -------------------------- Ph.D student Institute of Media, Information, and Network (M.I.N) Department of Electronic Engineering Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China SEIEE Building 1-307 Phone: +86 18516418125 From: wypppp @.> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2021 9:28 PM To: confiwent/BayesMPC @.> Cc: Subscribed @.***> Subject: [confiwent/BayesMPC] Could you please share your paper? (#1) Hello, I am interested in your paper, so could you please share your paper? Thanks! ― You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://apac01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fconfiwent%2FBayesMPC%2Fissues%2F1&data=04%7C01%7C%7C103df1a4ec2e4bfd91fc08d91c5c4128%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637572004815538632%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=oAlwvO%2FrEoOfiawRe7lNzTq1E%2BquRWWHIlB6BMEsPuQ%3D&reserved=0, or unsubscribehttps://apac01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAHLOQBCGJLBWVK62MOQLR5LTOZNWBANCNFSM45JE6ASQ&data=04%7C01%7C%7C103df1a4ec2e4bfd91fc08d91c5c4128%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637572004815548591%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=6QpKxPgTpx9LbOrpNplgxWU4q1v3us0pJ7lSyZYULaA%3D&reserved=0.

I am replicating your experiment and I would like to know how you predict throughput. After puffer, I don't think throughput is a very important metric, so I'm wondering if you have an innovative design.
Also, if I want to use VMAF as a QoE evaluation metric, how should I add it in?
Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants