-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 628
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
What: Replace broken PR #1236 with correct files and links #1263
Conversation
Why: * Need to introduce recommendations from the Moving Levels Task Force (mltf) * Need to incorporate TOC adjustments and new streamline process * previous PR had significant unresolvable merge conflicts This change address the need by: * Introduces Issue templates for graduation and incubation applications * provides the TOC with a streamlined guide for due diligence * move election-schedule into operations folder * introduce TOC templates for DD process for improved consistentcy * update the project process to a README reflecting these new changes * remove older files that are no longer relevant or obsolete becuase of these changes Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <[email protected]>
Once this PR is merged in, the new Issue template forms will need to be configured in GitHub so projects may use them. |
/vote |
Vote created@amye has called for a vote on The members of the following teams have binding votes:
Non-binding votes are also appreciated as a sign of support! How to voteYou can cast your vote by reacting to
Please note that voting for multiple options is not allowed and those votes won't be counted. The vote will be open for |
Co-authored-by: Jared Watts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <[email protected]>
### Adoption Assertion | ||
|
||
_The project has been adopted by the following organizations in a testing and integration or production capacity:_ | ||
* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
star not needed? looks odd in preview.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, thank you @TheFoxAtWork for making this much clear!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor comments, thanks
suggestions are grammatical, layout, punctuation, or other minor changes that do not change the content. Co-authored-by: Lin Sun <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kevin Wang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <[email protected]>
Vote closedThe vote passed! 🎉
Summary
Binding votes (8)
|
User | Vote | Timestamp |
---|---|---|
@dims | In favor | 2024-02-29 18:01:17.0 +00:00:00 |
Can you please confirm the implications of this PR being merged?
Also, this PR updated the documentation to tell people to use the new issue templates, but as they are not linked in config.yml they do not show as available. (If you would prefer this kind of discussion in an issue, rather than a merged PR, please let me know.) |
Why:
This change address the need by: