Integrate with object storage (Sourcery refactored)

[sourcery-ai]

Pull Request #8 refactored by Sourcery.

If you're happy with these changes, merge this Pull Request using the Squash and merge strategy.

NOTE: As code is pushed to the original Pull Request, Sourcery will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with new refactorings as
necessary. If Sourcery finds no refactorings at any point, this Pull Request
will be closed automatically.

See our documentation here.

Run Sourcery locally

Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:

• VS Code
• PyCharm

Review changes via command line

To manually merge these changes, make sure you're on the object-storage branch, then run:

git fetch origin sourcery/object-storage
git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
git reset HEAD^

Help us improve this pull request!

[sourcery-ai]

Function ObjectStorageClient._prepare_presigned_post_form_data refactored with the following changes:

• Applies the dictionary union operator where applicable. (use-dictionary-union)

[sourcery-ai]

Function env_file_object_expected_output refactored with the following changes:

• Applies the dictionary union operator where applicable. (use-dictionary-union)

[vercel]

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/br3ndonland/fastenv/Ht9YeWqKhwPAfgZfhq5H9PZ5jyaA
✅ Preview: https://fastenv-git-sourcery-object-storage-br3ndonland.vercel.app

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

Merging this PR leaves code quality unchanged.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	1.02 ⭐	1.02 ⭐	0.00
Method Length	36.34 ⭐	36.34 ⭐	0.00
Working memory	6.10 ⭐	6.10 ⭐	0.00
Quality	84.43% ⭐	84.43% ⭐	0.00%

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	589	589	0

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
tests/conftest.py	84.43% ⭐	84.43% ⭐	0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

[br3ndonland]

As explained in #9 and #10, the use-dictionary-union refactoring is not appropriate for this project. The dictionary union operator was introduced in Python 3.9. This project still supports Python 3.8. Attempting to use the union operator on Python 3.8 will result in errors, as seen in the failed mypy check on this PR.