Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

index/store/moss KV backend propagates mossStore's Stats() #420

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 12, 2016

Conversation

steveyen
Copy link
Contributor

@steveyen steveyen commented Sep 8, 2016

This change depends on the recently introduced mossStore Stats() API
in github.com/couchbase/moss 564bdbc0 commit.

Most of the change involves propagating the mossStore instance (the
statsFunc callback) so that it's accessible to the KVStore.Stats()
method.

See also: https://review.couchbase.org/#/c/67524/

This change depends on the recently introduced mossStore Stats() API
in github.com/couchbase/moss 564bdbc0 commit.  So, gvt for moss has
been updated as part of this change.

Most of the change involves propagating the mossStore instance (the
statsFunc callback) so that it's accessible to the KVStore.Stats()
method.

See also: https://review.couchbase.org/#/c/67524/
@steveyen
Copy link
Contributor Author

steveyen commented Sep 9, 2016

hi @mschoch - of note, there's a gvt update moss that's a part of this pull request

@mschoch
Copy link
Contributor

mschoch commented Sep 12, 2016

Sorry I missed this somehow. I see the gvt update also seems to have added a new line "vcs" to each entry. Do you happen to know if this is backwards compatible? It's not a big deal, just curious.

@mschoch
Copy link
Contributor

mschoch commented Sep 12, 2016

Answering my own question, it appears that the 'gvt restore' command we use in the travis CI worked on this PR branch, so no reason to think it isn't backwards compatible.

@mschoch mschoch merged commit f531835 into blevesearch:master Sep 12, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants