Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding PERFMON capability to docs #5801

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

javydekoning
Copy link

See #5795 for details.

Tools like intel_gpu_top need CAP_PERFMON which needs to be added when running containers in non-privileged mode (which is best practice).

Adding that capability requires Kernel >= 5.8.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 21, 2023

Deploy Preview for frigate-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ec26773
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/frigate-docs/deploys/641a207c060d450008590741
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-5801--frigate-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

Copy link
Sponsor Collaborator

@NickM-27 NickM-27 Mar 21, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this should be recommended by default in the docker config installation docs as it will cause confusion. I tried it on Unraid which runs linux kernel 6.1.20 and it failed due to unknown capability. Also, nvidia-smi and radeontop don't require this capability.

I would suggest adding a section to the Hardware Acceleration docs for GPU stats and mention this there

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, that's a Docker thing it seems...

docker/cli#3960

Might want to park this until Docker fixes it.

Copy link
Sponsor Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah yes, makes sense then 👍

@javydekoning
Copy link
Author

Closing this until docker/cli#3960 is completed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants