Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SO-6106: OWL converter improvements #1286

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

AAAlinaaa
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

... generated by making sure hierarchy root concepts are included in set
of data/object properties known by the OWL relationship converter
@AAAlinaaa AAAlinaaa self-assigned this May 7, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 7, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 5 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 48.26%. Comparing base (e9d1866) to head (9272abc).

Files Patch % Lines
...astore/request/SnomedOWLRelationshipConverter.java 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                9.x    #1286      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     48.26%   48.26%   -0.01%     
  Complexity    13938    13938              
============================================
  Files          1946     1946              
  Lines         95071    95075       +4     
  Branches      10983    10983              
============================================
+ Hits          45883    45884       +1     
- Misses        46192    46196       +4     
+ Partials       2996     2995       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@cmark cmark requested review from apeteri and cmark May 7, 2024 14:03
@apeteri
Copy link
Member

apeteri commented May 7, 2024

Superseded by changes in #1290 and callers of the modified constructor.

@apeteri apeteri closed this May 7, 2024
@apeteri apeteri deleted the issue/SO-6106-owl_converter_improvements_9.x branch May 7, 2024 21:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants