Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update express-jwt ^6.0.0 #157

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 12, 2020
Merged

Update express-jwt ^6.0.0 #157

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 12, 2020

Conversation

davidpatrick
Copy link
Contributor

  • Updates express-jwt dep
  • Fixes options sent to express-jwt
  • Tests ✅

@davidpatrick davidpatrick requested a review from a team August 8, 2020 21:33
@@ -161,7 +169,8 @@ describe('expressJwtSecret', () => {
cb(new Error('This is bad'));
}
}
})
}),
algorithms: [ 'RS256' ]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are these changes to add the algorithms array required from the express-jwt upgrade? Just want to make sure it's not a breaking change.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, @jimmyjames. That's the actual breaking change announced in the last v6 of express-jwt (which we want to upgrade to). See the updated readme and the cve.

@davidpatrick Changes look good 👍

@davidpatrick davidpatrick merged commit 04ddcdf into master Aug 12, 2020
@davidpatrick davidpatrick added this to the v1-Next milestone Aug 12, 2020
@davidpatrick davidpatrick changed the title Update express-jwt Update express-jwt ^6.0.0 Aug 12, 2020
@stevehobbsdev stevehobbsdev deleted the update-express-jwt branch August 18, 2020 13:38
@lbalmaceda lbalmaceda modified the milestones: v1-Next, 1.9.0 Aug 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants