Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

馃悰 Bug Report: "Query on attribute has greater than 100 values: $internalId" when creating subscriber #8299

Closed
2 tasks done
stnguyen90 opened this issue Jun 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

馃悰 Bug Report: "Query on attribute has greater than 100 values: $internalId" when creating subscriber #8299

stnguyen90 opened this issue Jun 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@stnguyen90
Labels
bug Something isn't working product / messaging Fixes and upgrades for the Appwrite Messaging.

Comments

@stnguyen90
Copy link
Contributor

馃憻 Reproduction steps

  1. Create 101 users
  2. Create a topic
  3. Create 101 subscribers in the topic

馃憤 Expected behavior

No errors

馃憥 Actual Behavior

API returns 400:

Query on attribute has greater than 100 values: $internalId

馃幉 Appwrite version

Appwrite Cloud

馃捇 Operating system

Linux

馃П Your Environment

No response

馃憖 Have you spent some time to check if this issue has been raised before?

  • I checked and didn't find similar issue

馃彚 Have you read the Code of Conduct?
@stnguyen90 stnguyen90 added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 20, 2024
@stnguyen90 stnguyen90 self-assigned this Jun 20, 2024
@stnguyen90 stnguyen90 added the product / messaging Fixes and upgrades for the Appwrite Messaging. label Jun 20, 2024
@stnguyen90 stnguyen90 mentioned this issue Jun 20, 2024
Merged
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@stnguyen90 stnguyen90

Labels
bug Something isn't working product / messaging Fixes and upgrades for the Appwrite Messaging.
Projects
1.5 release
Status: Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@stnguyen90