Try to fix CI

[sxjscience]

Description

It looks that this issue #16815 is blocking the CI.

Revised based on the error message in http:https://jenkins.mxnet-ci.amazon-ml.com/blue/organizations/jenkins/mxnet-validation%2Funix-cpu/detail/PR-16902/4/pipeline

Checklist

Essentials

Please feel free to remove inapplicable items for your PR.

• The PR title starts with [MXNET-$JIRA_ID], where $JIRA_ID refers to the relevant JIRA issue created (except PRs with tiny changes)
• Changes are complete (i.e. I finished coding on this PR)
• All changes have test coverage:
• Unit tests are added for small changes to verify correctness (e.g. adding a new operator)
• Nightly tests are added for complicated/long-running ones (e.g. changing distributed kvstore)
• Build tests will be added for build configuration changes (e.g. adding a new build option with NCCL)
• Code is well-documented:
• For user-facing API changes, API doc string has been updated.
• For new C++ functions in header files, their functionalities and arguments are documented.
• For new examples, README.md is added to explain the what the example does, the source of the dataset, expected performance on test set and reference to the original paper if applicable
• Check the API doc at https://mxnet-ci-doc.s3-accelerate.dualstack.amazonaws.com/PR-$PR_ID/$BUILD_ID/index.html
• To the my best knowledge, examples are either not affected by this change, or have been fixed to be compatible with this change

Changes

• Feature1, tests, (and when applicable, API doc)
• Feature2, tests, (and when applicable, API doc)

Comments

• If this change is a backward incompatible change, why must this change be made.
• Interesting edge cases to note here

[larroy]

LGTM

[marcoabreu]

Approving, but I'd appreciate if you could bisect and find out which PR introduced the issue and find out how it was possible to merge it while having missing dependencies. Something seems off.

[sxjscience]

@marcoabreu I’m also wondering how this would ever be possible. I guest it’s due to some internal update of the CI machines.

[marcoabreu]

The environment is fully dockerized, so changes on the CI machines shouldn't impact it as far as I know

[larroy]

this could be a ccache cache issue. I can't reproduce locally. TVM lib seems corrupted.

[larroy]

If this change is not fixing the failure, could we revert it if the additional deps are not needed?

[larroy]

#16478 (comment)

[sxjscience]

@larroy Yes, we should revert it