Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 17, 2023. It is now read-only.

[MXNET-978] Higher Order Gradient Support rsqrt, rcbrt. #15476

Merged

Conversation

kshitij12345
Copy link
Contributor

Description

PR intends to add support for higher order gradient for rsqrt, rcbrt.

Checklist

Essentials

Please feel free to remove inapplicable items for your PR.

  • The PR title starts with [MXNET-$JIRA_ID], where $JIRA_ID refers to the relevant JIRA-978 issue created (except PRs with tiny changes)
  • Changes are complete (i.e. I finished coding on this PR)
  • All changes have test coverage:
  • Unit tests are added for small changes to verify correctness (e.g. adding a new operator)
  • Nightly tests are added for complicated/long-running ones (e.g. changing distributed kvstore)
  • Build tests will be added for build configuration changes (e.g. adding a new build option with NCCL)
  • Code is well-documented:
  • For user-facing API changes, API doc string has been updated.
  • For new C++ functions in header files, their functionalities and arguments are documented.
  • For new examples, README.md is added to explain the what the example does, the source of the dataset, expected performance on test set and reference to the original paper if applicable
  • Check the API doc at http:https://mxnet-ci-doc.s3-accelerate.dualstack.amazonaws.com/PR-$PR_ID/$BUILD_ID/index.html
  • To the my best knowledge, examples are either not affected by this change, or have been fixed to be compatible with this change

Changes

  • higher order gradient for a rsqrt, rcbrt.
  • unit test for the same.

@apeforest apeforest self-requested a review July 8, 2019 04:58
@roywei
Copy link
Member

roywei commented Jul 8, 2019

@mxnet-label-bot add[pr-awaiting-review, Operator, Backend]

@marcoabreu marcoabreu added Backend Issues related to the backend of MXNet Operator pr-awaiting-review PR is waiting for code review labels Jul 8, 2019
@karan6181
Copy link
Contributor

@apeforest Could you please review this PR? Thanks!

@karan6181
Copy link
Contributor

@kshitij12345 Could you please resolve the merge conflicts?
@apeforest Gentle ping for review ..
Thanks!

@kshitij12345
Copy link
Contributor Author

I guess we should wait till #15531 is in.

@kshitij12345
Copy link
Contributor Author

@apeforest @larroy @sxjscience
Gentle ping for review

@kshitij12345
Copy link
Contributor Author

@apeforest @larroy @sxjscience
Gentle ping for review

@sxjscience sxjscience merged commit 58cbd65 into apache:master Jan 14, 2020
@sxjscience
Copy link
Member

@kshitij12345 Thanks!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Backend Issues related to the backend of MXNet Operator pr-awaiting-review PR is waiting for code review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants