Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 17, 2023. It is now read-only.

[Quantization] Support zero-size tensor input for quantization flow #15031

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 23, 2019

Conversation

ciyongch
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR is to support zero-size tensor input for quantization flow.
Let's take RNN related model as an example, the begin_state is always initialized into shape (0, self._num_hidden), it worked well in FP32 pass, but failed in INT8 pass due to unknown dimension error with latest MXNet code base.
With this patch, models with such inputs are able to be quantized and run in INT8 mode.

@pengzhao-intel @TaoLv @ZhennanQin

Checklist

Essentials

Please feel free to remove inapplicable items for your PR.

  • The PR title starts with [MXNET-$JIRA_ID], where $JIRA_ID refers to the relevant JIRA issue created (except PRs with tiny changes)
  • Changes are complete (i.e. I finished coding on this PR)
  • All changes have test coverage:
  • Unit tests are added for small changes to verify correctness (e.g. adding a new operator)
  • Nightly tests are added for complicated/long-running ones (e.g. changing distributed kvstore)
  • Build tests will be added for build configuration changes (e.g. adding a new build option with NCCL)
  • Code is well-documented:
  • For user-facing API changes, API doc string has been updated.
  • For new C++ functions in header files, their functionalities and arguments are documented.
  • For new examples, README.md is added to explain the what the example does, the source of the dataset, expected performance on test set and reference to the original paper if applicable
  • Check the API doc at http:https://mxnet-ci-doc.s3-accelerate.dualstack.amazonaws.com/PR-$PR_ID/$BUILD_ID/index.html
  • To the my best knowledge, examples are either not affected by this change, or have been fixed to be compatible with this change

Changes

  • Feature1, tests, (and when applicable, API doc)
  • Feature2, tests, (and when applicable, API doc)

Comments

  • If this change is a backward incompatible change, why must this change be made.
  • Interesting edge cases to note here

@pengzhao-intel
Copy link
Contributor

@ZhennanQin @TaoLv @xinyu-intel please help take a review.

@pengzhao-intel
Copy link
Contributor

Please also add a test case

@ciyongch
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pengzhao-intel @TaoLv test case is added, redundant file is remove. Please help to review again:)

Copy link
Contributor

@pengzhao-intel pengzhao-intel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the improvements.

LGTM

CPU Performance and Quantization automation moved this from Review in progress to Reviewer approved May 22, 2019
@ZhennanQin
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM.

@pengzhao-intel
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your contribution. Merging now.

@pengzhao-intel pengzhao-intel merged commit d4e458e into apache:master May 23, 2019
CPU Performance and Quantization automation moved this from Reviewer approved to Done May 23, 2019
haohuanw pushed a commit to haohuanw/incubator-mxnet that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2019
…pache#15031)

* [Quantization] Support zero-size tensor input for quantization flow

* Comment out quantized_act and quantized_sum

* retrigger CI

* Add test cases
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants