[MXNET-1253] fix control_flow_op

[apeforest]

Description

Support large array in control_flow_ops

Checklist

Essentials

Please feel free to remove inapplicable items for your PR.

• The PR title starts with [MXNET-$JIRA_ID], where $JIRA_ID refers to the relevant JIRA issue created (except PRs with tiny changes)
• Changes are complete (i.e. I finished coding on this PR)
• All changes have test coverage:
• Unit tests are added for small changes to verify correctness (e.g. adding a new operator)
• Nightly tests are added for complicated/long-running ones (e.g. changing distributed kvstore)
• Build tests will be added for build configuration changes (e.g. adding a new build option with NCCL)
• Code is well-documented:
• For user-facing API changes, API doc string has been updated.
• For new C++ functions in header files, their functionalities and arguments are documented.
• For new examples, README.md is added to explain the what the example does, the source of the dataset, expected performance on test set and reference to the original paper if applicable
• Check the API doc at http:https://mxnet-ci-doc.s3-accelerate.dualstack.amazonaws.com/PR-$PR_ID/$BUILD_ID/index.html
• To the my best knowledge, examples are either not affected by this change, or have been fixed to be compatible with this change

Changes

• test_large_array.py:test_where()

[apeforest]

@zheng-da @anirudh2290 @sandeep-krishnamurthy @yuxihu @frankfliu Please review

[yuxihu]

LGTM.

[ChaiBapchya]

LGTM!

[sandeep-krishnamurthy]

Thanks! LGTM

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #13555 into master will increase coverage by 0.54%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #13555      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.69%   83.24%   +0.54%     
==========================================
  Files         720      745      +25     
  Lines       79320    83337    +4017     
  Branches     3190     3188       -2     
==========================================
+ Hits        65596    69376    +3780     
- Misses      12863    13102     +239     
+ Partials      861      859       -2

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/operator/tensor/control_flow_op.h	96.22% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
src/operator/tensor/dot-inl.cuh	90.38% <0%> (-1.93%)	⬇️
...re-package/src/org/apache/clojure_mxnet/random.clj	100% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
tests/cpp/kvstore/gpu_topology_test.cc	97.28% <0%> (ø)
tests/cpp/operator/batchnorm_test.cc	87.07% <0%> (ø)
tests/cpp/operator/runner/core_op_runner_test.cc	95.86% <0%> (ø)
tests/cpp/operator/fully_conn_perf.cc	94.73% <0%> (ø)
tests/cpp/include/test_core_op.h	95.23% <0%> (ø)
tests/cpp/operator/tune/operator_tune_test.cc	92.15% <0%> (ø)
tests/cpp/misc/base.cc	100% <0%> (ø)
... and 22 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8bbac82...08f4977. Read the comment docs.

[apeforest]

@mxnet-label-bot Update [pr-awaiting-merge]

[apeforest]

@mxnet-label-bot Update [pr-awaiting-merge, Operator]

[sandeep-krishnamurthy]

Thanks. LGTM.

[sandeep-krishnamurthy]

@TaoLv - I see your comments are addressed. This is good to merge, I will wait for your confirmation.

[anirudh2290]

Can you add the remaining test for scatter_nd or is it planned for a different PR ?

[apeforest]

@anirudh2290 It's planned for a different PR as this PR does not directly fix scatter_nd

[TaoLv]

Seems all comments are addressed. Now merging.