Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FLINK-12254][table] Update value literals to new type system #8581

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

twalthr
Copy link
Contributor

@twalthr twalthr commented May 31, 2019

What is the purpose of the change

This PR updates ValueLiteralExpression and nullOf to the new type system. All existing tests still pass.

Additionally, it deprecates the old Types classes that were providing type information.

Brief change log

  • ValueLiteralExpression returns DataType now
  • Types class has been ported and is deprecated now

Verifying this change

This change is already covered by existing tests.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): yes
  • The serializers: no
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: no
  • The S3 file system connector: no

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? JavaDocs

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.


The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

Copy link
Contributor

@dawidwys dawidwys left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good work! Just some minor typos.

* instances must strictly adhere to the schema defined by the type info.
*
* @param fieldNames array of field names
* @param types array of field types
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

really nit: We could have the same description for types param as in Row(TypeInformation... types)

* <p>Distinction between {@link BasicArrayTypeInfo} and {@link ObjectArrayTypeInfo}.
* <li>Let POJOs, case classes, and tuples pass through the planner.</li>
*
* <li>Inconsistent nullability. Most types are nullable even though type information does not support it.</li>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Duplicated item.

@@ -183,22 +183,22 @@ abstract class LogicalWindowAggregateRuleBase(description: String)
TumblingGroupWindow(
windowRef,
timeField,
new ValueLiteralExpression(interval, INTERVAL_MILLIS))
new ValueLiteralExpression(interval, fromLegacyInfoToDataType(INTERVAL_MILLIS)))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about just use DataTypes explicitly?

return defaultMethod(valueLiteralExpression);
}
return ExpressionUtils.extractValue(valueLiteralExpression, Integer.class)
.map((i) -> Collections.singletonList(inputFieldReferences.get(i - 1)))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: unnecessary parenthesis around i.

@twalthr
Copy link
Contributor Author

twalthr commented Jun 5, 2019

Thank you @dawidwys. Merging...

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 772b8ba Jun 5, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants