Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FLINK-12101] Race condition when concurrently running uploaded jars via REST #8543

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

leesf
Copy link
Contributor

@leesf leesf commented May 26, 2019

What is the purpose of the change

Fix race condition when concurrently running uploaded jars via REST.

Brief change log

  • Introduce a ThreadLocal field to store ExecutionEnvironmentFactory
  • When contextEnvironmentFactory is null, use ThreadLocal to get Factory.

Verifying this change

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (no)
  • The serializers: (no)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (no)
  • The S3 file system connector: (no)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not documented)

cc @tillrohrmann

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.


The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

return contextEnvironmentFactory == null ?
createLocalEnvironment() : contextEnvironmentFactory.createExecutionEnvironment();
(contextEnvironmentFactoryThreadLocal.get() == null ?
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to add contextEnvironmentFactoryThreadLocal check in the function areExplicitEnvironmentsAllowed(line 1284). I can't add a review there.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your review @klion26. Good catch and updated.

@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann self-assigned this May 28, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for creating this PR @leesf. I had a comment about the precedence of the factory fields. Moreover, I think we need to do the same for the StreamExecutionEnvironment if I'm not mistaken.

It would also be good if we could add a test for this fix. We could create a dummy ExecutionEnvironmentFactory for this purpose.

return contextEnvironmentFactory == null ?
createLocalEnvironment() : contextEnvironmentFactory.createExecutionEnvironment();
(contextEnvironmentFactoryThreadLocal.get() == null ?
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would suggest to first check the thread local variable and then fall back to the static variable. That way, it would not be possible to override the value of an ExecutionEnvironment which has been set explicitly by from another thread.

@leesf
Copy link
Contributor Author

leesf commented Jun 4, 2019

@tillrohrmann Thanks for your review. Updated this PR to address your comments.

Copy link
Contributor

@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for addressing my comments @leesf. LGTM. The failing test case is unrelated. Merging this PR now.

tillrohrmann added a commit to leesf/flink that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2019
…solveFactory

ExecutionEnvironment#resolveFactory selects between the thread local and the global factory.
This method is used by the ExecutionEnvironment as well as the StreamExecutionEnvironment.

This closes apache#8543.
leesf and others added 2 commits June 6, 2019 11:16
…solveFactory

ExecutionEnvironment#resolveFactory selects between the thread local and the global factory.
This method is used by the ExecutionEnvironment as well as the StreamExecutionEnvironment.

This closes apache#8543.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
5 participants