Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[hotfix][docs] Add that LIMIT requires ORDER BY. #7737

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

fhueske
Copy link
Contributor

@fhueske fhueske commented Feb 18, 2019

What is the purpose of the change

Fixes the documentation of SQL LIMIT which requires the ORDER BY clause.

Brief change log

  • add a note explaining that LIMIT requires ORDER BY
  • fix example

Verifying this change

  • build docs and check manually.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): no
  • The serializers: no
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: no
  • The S3 file system connector: no

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? n/a

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Feb 18, 2019

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Review Progress

  • ✅ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ✅ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ✅ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ✅ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot approve description to approve the 1st aspect (similarly, it also supports the consensus, architecture and quality keywords)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval

@sunjincheng121 sunjincheng121 self-assigned this Feb 28, 2019
@sunjincheng121
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the fix @fhueske!
LGTM. Merging.
@flinkbot approve all

sunjincheng121 pushed a commit to sunjincheng121/flink that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2019
@asfgit asfgit closed this in be9f030 Feb 28, 2019
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2019
@sunjincheng121
Copy link
Member

Fixed in master: be9f030
Fixed in release-1.8: 77dc5de

HuangZhenQiu pushed a commit to HuangZhenQiu/flink that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants