Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP][ISSUE #4426] Optimize EventMesh Bridge with QUIC #4427

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

seriouszyx
Copy link
Member

Fixes #4426.

@qqeasonchen qqeasonchen changed the title [WIP][ISSUE #4426] Optimize EventBridge with QUIC [WIP][ISSUE #4426] Optimize EventMesh Bridge with QUIC Sep 4, 2023
Copy link
Member

@mxsm mxsm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@seriouszyx Please fix code style
image

Copy link
Member

@pandaapo pandaapo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The tag for the title of this PR has always been WIP, so is this PR still under development?

@@ -271,6 +272,9 @@ private void registerHTTPRequestProcessor() throws Exception {
final LocalSubscribeEventProcessor localSubscribeEventProcessor = new LocalSubscribeEventProcessor(this);
this.getHandlerService().register(localSubscribeEventProcessor, clientManageExecutor);

final QuicLocalSubscribeEventProcessor quicLocalSubscribeEventProcessor = new QuicLocalSubscribeEventProcessor(this);
this.getHandlerService().register(quicLocalSubscribeEventProcessor, clientManageExecutor);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could this QUIC protocol be made configurable? If not configured, it will be enabled or disabled by default.

可不可以把 QUIC 协议的方式做成可配置的?不配置话的就默认开启或不开启。

Channel channel = bs.group(group)
.channel(NioDatagramChannel.class)
.handler(codec)
.bind(new InetSocketAddress(9999)).sync().channel();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can the port of this protocol be made configurable?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2024

It has been 60 days since the last activity on this pull request. I am reaching out here to gently remind you that the Apache EventMesh community values every pull request, and please feel free to get in touch with the reviewers at any time. They are available to assist you in advancing the progress of your pull request and offering the latest feedback.

If you encounter any challenges during development, seeking support within the community is encouraged. We sincerely appreciate your contributions to Apache EventMesh.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Apr 8, 2024
@Pil0tXia
Copy link
Member

Pil0tXia commented Apr 9, 2024

Any progress we can make here?

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale label Apr 9, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 8, 2024

It has been 60 days since the last activity on this pull request. I am reaching out here to gently remind you that the Apache EventMesh community values every pull request, and please feel free to get in touch with the reviewers at any time. They are available to assist you in advancing the progress of your pull request and offering the latest feedback.

If you encounter any challenges during development, seeking support within the community is encouraged. We sincerely appreciate your contributions to Apache EventMesh.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jun 8, 2024
@Pil0tXia Pil0tXia added the waiting for contributor PR is awaiting the contributor's response to the review for further evaluation. label Jun 12, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale label Jun 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

It has been 60 days since the last activity on this pull request. I am reaching out here to gently remind you that the Apache EventMesh community values every pull request, and please feel free to get in touch with the reviewers at any time. They are available to assist you in advancing the progress of your pull request and offering the latest feedback.

If you encounter any challenges during development, seeking support within the community is encouraged. We sincerely appreciate your contributions to Apache EventMesh.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Aug 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Stale waiting for contributor PR is awaiting the contributor's response to the review for further evaluation.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement] Optimize EventMesh Bridge with QUIC
4 participants