-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: add Centos/RHEL9+, thanks for nothing RedHat #4686
Conversation
Due to the generous support from IBM's Z open source support team (@kun-lu20) in apache/couchdb-ci#54 we have RHEL9 (clone) support with the caveat that it depends on the EPEL repo. I just uploaded the x86-64 3.3.2 centos-9 rpm to our artifactory
|
sudo yum-config-manager --add-repo https://couchdb.apache.org/repo/couchdb.repo | ||
# Enable EPEL for the SpiderMonkey dependency | ||
sudo dnf config-manager --set-enabled crb | ||
sudo dnf install epel-release epel-next-release |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For me on Almalinux 9 VM adding epel-next-release
wasn't needed. I used just epel-release
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch! That’s why I specifically pulled out RedHat >=9 from RedHat/CentOS <=9) — I hope that helps. IF we get reports that the “next” bit is wrong, we can adjust on the fly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah good point. It's a RHEL 9 only instructions. Most people would probably figure the Almalinux / Rocky 9 instructions. If we got a lot questions we can add them later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1
Package created, signed and was uploaded. See a minor comment about epel-next. I tried it on AlmaLinux 9 not sure if it's a Rocky vs Centos9 vs Alma thing or something else.
thanks for nothing RedHat
Heh ;-) Tbh, I think this is just as much a "Thanks for nothing, Mozilla". I can't blame Redhat not wanting to support Spidermonkey 78 for 15 years. I wouldn't either.
We have the same problem as Redhat as SM keeps changing their "stable" API with every release (see #4305) That stuff works for a browser, but is not tenable for an "embedded" engine.
totes fair :) This is just happening at the same time as RedHat is trying to take the RHEL sources private, which creates uncertainty and potentially more work for us for no good reason :) |
we can merge this after we publish the rocky9 build rpm