update Fauxton and Docs git repo urls

[garrensmith]

Update Git repos

Overview

Fauxton and Documentation are now using gitbox. This means we need to change the repository urls to use github.

Testing recommendations

./configure should now run

Checklist

• Code is written and works correctly;
• Changes are covered by tests;
• Documentation reflects the changes;
• I will not forget to update rebar.config.script
  with the correct commit hash once this PR get merged.

[janl]

+1

For next time, please keep whitespace changes in a separate commit. It makes things easier to review :)

[lostnet]

My automated builds are using anonymous clone over https, so git over ssh fails on the github hostkey, etc. Maybe https urls would work correctly for both configurations:

-{docs,             "documentation",    "59a887a97f9b6befc6de0c5bdaf17d79fb7f915d", [raw]},
+{docs,             {url, "https://github.com/apache/couchdb-documentation.git"},    "59a887a97f9b6befc6de0c5bdaf17d79fb7f915d", [raw]},
 {ddoc_cache,       "ddoc-cache",       "c762e90a33ce3cda19ef142dd1120f1087ecd876"},
 {ets_lru,          "ets-lru",          "c05488c8b1d7ec1c3554a828e0c9bf2888932ed6"},
 {fabric,           "fabric",           "d22903c0ceaf19a305e67b5b7322cbdc4e5e9340"},
-{fauxton,          "fauxton",          {tag, "v1.1.9"}, [raw]},
+{fauxton,          {url, "https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton.git"},          {tag, "v1.1.9"}, [raw]},

[wohali]

I'm confused. Are the canonical URLs for our repos now at github.com or gitbox.apache.org? I thought it was the latter, which would make this PR incorrect.

[kxepal]

I'm with @wohali.

[garrensmith]

It's both, but it seems the preferred way is to use the github repo's and use gitbox as a fallback  All misspelling thanks to my iPhone. On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:49 PM +0200, "Alexander Shorin" <[email protected]> wrote: I'm with @wohali. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[janl]

It's both, but it seems the preferred way is to use the github repo's and use gitbox as a fallback

There is no preferred way. Individual developers can pick either route.

As for where the canonical source for CouchDB lives, it is clearly gitbox.

[garrensmith]

I'm closing this. @nickva did a much better fix and its in master