Handle private gateways more reliably #1474
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
remibergsma
changed the title
remibergsma
force-pushed
the
47_private_gw_initial_config
branch
from
ab38e4b
to
f4f9b3a
Compare
|
I will add this to my CI queue. Do we want to maintain commit history for the two commits in this case? Also, I am looking for code reviews on this one. Thanks... |
|
@swill I don't think many people read spurious comments on the github PRs. only fanatics do :p |
| @@ -274,3 +277,46 @@ def __moveFile(self, origPath, path): | |||
| os.makedirs(path) | |||
| timestamp = str(int(round(time.time()))) | |||
| os.rename(origPath, path + "/" + self.fileName + "." + timestamp) | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
| class PrivateGatewayHack: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
maybe not the greatest class name ever
|
LGTM in spite of comments. |
|
We're pulling this in for testing. |
|
cool thanks. :) |
CI RESULTSAssociated Uploads
Uploads will be available until Comment created by |
|
I need one more code review and this one should be ready to merge. @kiwiflyer did you have a chance to review this one? |
|
LGTM. Tested in a hardware lab. tag:mergeready |
|
Thank you sir. I will get this merged... |
asfgit
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 12, 2016
Handle private gateways more reliablyWhen initialising a VPC router we need to know which IP/device corresponds to a private gateway. This is to solve a problem when stop/starting a VPC router (which gets the private gateway config as a guest network and as a result breaks the functionality). You read it right, the private gateway is sent as type=guest after reboot and type=public initially.
Before this change, you could add a private gw to a running router but you couldn't restart it (it would mix up the tiers). Now the private gateway is detected properly and it works just fine.
Booting without private gateway:
```
root@r-167-VM:~# cat /etc/cloudstack/cmdline.json
{
"config": {
"baremetalnotificationapikey": "V2l1u3wKJVan01h8kq63-5Y5Ia3VLEW1v_Z6i-31QIRJXlt5vkqaqf6DVcdK0jP3u79SW6X9pqJSLSwQP2c2Rw",
"baremetalnotificationsecuritykey": "OXI16srCrxFBi-xOtEwcYqwLlMfSFTlTg66YHtXBBqR7HNN1us3HP5zWOKxfVmz4a3C1kUNLPrUH13gNmZlu4w",
"disable_rp_filter": "true",
"dns1": "8.8.8.8",
"domain": "cs2cloud",
"eth0ip": "169.254.0.42",
"eth0mask": "255.255.0.0",
"host": "192.168.22.61",
"name": "r-167-VM",
"port": "8080",
"privategateway": "None",
"redundant_router": "false",
"template": "domP",
"type": "vpcrouter",
"vpccidr": "10.0.0.0/24"
},
"id": "cmdline"
```
Booting with private gateway:
```
root@r-167-VM:~# cat /etc/cloudstack/cmdline.json
{
"config": {
"baremetalnotificationapikey": "V2l1u3wKJVan01h8kq63-5Y5Ia3VLEW1v_Z6i-31QIRJXlt5vkqaqf6DVcdK0jP3u79SW6X9pqJSLSwQP2c2Rw",
"baremetalnotificationsecuritykey": "OXI16srCrxFBi-xOtEwcYqwLlMfSFTlTg66YHtXBBqR7HNN1us3HP5zWOKxfVmz4a3C1kUNLPrUH13gNmZlu4w",
"disable_rp_filter": "true",
"dns1": "8.8.8.8",
"domain": "cs2cloud",
"eth0ip": "169.254.2.227",
"eth0mask": "255.255.0.0",
"host": "192.168.22.61",
"name": "r-167-VM",
"port": "8080",
"privategateway": "10.201.10.1",
"redundant_router": "false",
"template": "domP",
"type": "vpcrouter",
"vpccidr": "10.0.0.0/24"
},
"id": "cmdline"
```
And:
```
cat cmdline
vpccidr=10.0.0.0/24 domain=cs2cloud dns1=8.8.8.8 privategateway=10.201.10.1 template=domP name=r-167-VM eth0ip=169.254.2.227 eth0mask=255.255.0.0 type=vpcrouter disable_rp_filter=true baremetalnotificationsecuritykey=OXI16srCrxFBi-xOtEwcYqwLlMfSFTlTg66YHtXBBqR7HNN1us3HP5zWOKxfVmz4a3C1kUNLPrUH13gNmZlu4w baremetalnotificationapikey=V2l1u3wKJVan01h8kq63-5Y5Ia3VLEW1v_Z6i-31QIRJXlt5vkqaqf6DVcdK0jP3u79SW6X9pqJSLSwQP2c2Rw host=192.168.22.61 port=8080
```
Logs:
```
2016-02-24 20:08:45,723 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-4:ctx-458d4c52 job-1402/job-1403 ctx-d5355fca) (logid:5772906c) Set privategateway field in cmd_line.json to 10.201.10.1
```
* pr/1474:
Handle private gateways more reliably
Add private gateway IP to router initialization config
Signed-off-by: Will Stevens <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When initialising a VPC router we need to know which IP/device corresponds to a private gateway. This is to solve a problem when stop/starting a VPC router (which gets the private gateway config as a guest network and as a result breaks the functionality). You read it right, the private gateway is sent as type=guest after reboot and type=public initially.
Before this change, you could add a private gw to a running router but you couldn't restart it (it would mix up the tiers). Now the private gateway is detected properly and it works just fine.
Booting without private gateway:
Booting with private gateway:
And:
Logs: