Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

js.pusher.com is not an ad/tracking service #77

Closed
c0defre4k opened this issue Mar 10, 2020 · 9 comments
Closed

js.pusher.com is not an ad/tracking service #77

c0defre4k opened this issue Mar 10, 2020 · 9 comments

Comments

@c0defre4k
Copy link

Hello,
is there a specific reason why js.pusher.com is blocked?
Pusher is a framework used by modern web applications to provide realtime data through web-sockets. Although it can be used for advertising its not the main purpose if this service. Blocking this domain breaks base functionality of many website that use this technology.

In my opinion this should be removed from the list, to not break anything.

@liamengland1
Copy link

Provide examples of breakage.

@c0defre4k
Copy link
Author

In my case its a backend application to manage the content of a website, which uses pusher to provide live updates instead of reloading the whole page.
Because the js.pusher.com is blocked it actually prevents the application from booting and I'm stuck at looking at a loading animation.

Pusher's website describes pretty good what this service is used for - this is not a tool used for advertising or tracking.
In the developer docs you see that they provide their Client SDK through the js.pusher.com domain. ws.pusherapp.com is the domain where the websocket connection is established to.

Therefore these domains should be removed from the list:

  • ws.pusherapp.com
  • js.pusher.com

@dnmTX
Copy link

dnmTX commented Mar 10, 2020

@c0defre4k the lists owner is away at the moment and i'm not sure when he'll be back to validate your request. Will advise you to whitelist it on your end and keep an eye on the issue here for any changes/updates.

@c0defre4k
Copy link
Author

@dnmTX thanks for the info! That's what I already did in my setup. I'll have an eye on this ticket until the author has reviewed it. I'm sure it wasn't his intention to block a service like this.

@anudeepND
Copy link
Owner

Sorry for the delay guys, I will remove it in the next update :)

@anudeepND
Copy link
Owner

Removed in ce987e1

@mestrogov
Copy link

ws.pusherapp.com was not removed.

@c0defre4k
Copy link
Author

@anudeepND can you please also remove ws.pusherapp.com?

@anudeepND
Copy link
Owner

Oops...it will be removed in the next update :)

anudeepND added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants