fix(layout): footer fixed position attribute

[NicmeisteR]

The footer fixed attribute did not apply fixed positioning, although the docs in the API say it should.

Please read and mark the following check list before creating a pull request:

• I read and followed the CONTRIBUTING.md guide.
• I read and followed the New Feature Checklist guide.

Short description of what this resolves:

This solves the fact that the "fixed" attribute on the Footer Layout did not apply fixed positioning.
Linked issue: #237

[NicmeisteR]

Good day @Tibing! Can you please take a look at the above, it refers to issue: #237

[NicmeisteR]

Any feedback on this issue?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.78%. Comparing base (db9e556) to head (f8fdd48).
Report is 158 commits behind head on master.

❗ Current head f8fdd48 differs from pull request most recent head a9ad036

Please upload reports for the commit a9ad036 to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2694      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.82%   77.78%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         262      262              
  Lines        8229     8227       -2     
  Branches      896      896              
==========================================
- Hits         6404     6399       -5     
- Misses       1550     1553       +3     
  Partials      275      275              

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[NicmeisteR]

Bumping, as it's been more than a year now.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
5.6% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[NicmeisteR]

It's been 3 years 😢

[NicmeisteR]

Hi @nnixaa , could you please have a look at this?