Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix #987: implement client timeouts #1028

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 1, 2016
Merged

Fix #987: implement client timeouts #1028

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 1, 2016

Conversation

asvetlov
Copy link
Member

Fix for #987

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 31, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 97.942% when pulling 05890bd on client_timeout into 1bfc02a on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 31, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 97.942% when pulling 407a5ab on client_timeout into 1bfc02a on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 31, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 97.942% when pulling 9e3444d on client_timeout into 1bfc02a on master.

@asvetlov asvetlov merged commit dc79e14 into master Aug 1, 2016
@asvetlov asvetlov deleted the client_timeout branch August 1, 2016 10:21
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Oct 29, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been
any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for
related bugs.

If you feel like there's important points made in this discussion,
please include those exceprts into that new issue.

@lock lock bot added the outdated label Oct 29, 2019
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 29, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
outdated
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@asvetlov @coveralls