forked from HelloZeroNet/ZeroNet
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add I2P Support #141
Comments
This was referenced Oct 22, 2023
marek22k
pushed a commit
to marek22k/ZeroNet
that referenced
this issue
Oct 30, 2023
ask for optional mute reason
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I'm a bit frustrated because Zeronet only works over Tor. Tor is - depending on your point of view - somewhat centralized (by the servers knowing the nodes and bridges). So it would be nice to add another option as well.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Support for another dark web. The best known are Tor, I2P and Freenet. Only Tor and I2P also support data transport. Tor support is already included.
Describe the solution you'd like
My suggestion would be the Darknet I2P. This is designed more for internal services and has no exit nodes (without further configuration).
Additional context
I2P offers two interfaces - BOB and SAM. However, BOB is considered outdated by the official team (still supported by i2pd). Both offer the SAM interface, which is simple but very functional. Furthermore there are two I2P implementations Java I2P and i2pd.
Java I2P is the official implementation. It is being developed further by various developers.
i2pd is an implementation of I2P written in C++. It was originally written by Russian developers.
In the meantime, both teams are coordinating and talking to each other. The implementations are compatible with each other.
Links
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: