Add WireMock.Net.xUnit project

[StefH]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #759 (e0e0087) into master (ca6c39c) will decrease coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 52.77%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #759      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.88%   72.79%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         194      195       +1     
  Lines        6919     6955      +36     
  Branches      727      729       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         5043     5063      +20     
- Misses       1656     1673      +17     
+ Partials      220      219       -1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...reMock.Net.xUnit/TestOutputHelperWireMockLogger.cs	52.77% <52.77%> (ø)
src/WireMock.Net/Server/WireMockServer.Admin.cs	58.59% <0.00%> (+0.14%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ca6c39c...e0e0087. Read the comment docs.

[siewers]

I think the namespace should be WireMock.Net.Xunit to follow the same naming as the xUnit project.

[StefH]

Fixed

[siewers]

I guess folders, assembly names etc. should be renamed to Xunit as well :)

[StefH]

I was doubting about the name.

I see some NuGet packages like xxx.xUnit and xxx.Xunit

And xunit itself is named:

So what to do ?

[siewers]

Yes, it's a mess.
I would suggest to stick with the same namespace as used in the xUnit framework.

I would say in namespaces and assembly use Xunit.
In all documentation and text use xUnit.

The all lowercase version is not really used anywhere besides the xUnit assemblies, which is likely of legacy reasons.

It's basically caused by the conflict of C# using pascal case but xUnit starting with a lowercase letter which makes it a bit difficult 🙂