Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More Quality Cleanup #126

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2014
Merged

More Quality Cleanup #126

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2014

Conversation

hazendaz
Copy link
Member

@hazendaz hazendaz commented Aug 2, 2014

  • use explicit reference such as this or static references
  • use proper java variable instance naming (ie not underscores preceding
    name)
  • use proper java case on static final variables such as LOGGER
  • removed unnecessary definitions of remoteHost, remoteAddr, and
    remotePort shadowed from tomcat super classes under test cases. Renamed
    session to httpSession as that shadow was separate and needed to be
    defined separately.
  • updated tomcat 7 to 7.0.55
  • started adding comments in tomcat 8 and will follow in others
    regarding pieces of tomcat not actually implemented within test cases in
    an effort to make it more obvious to what is being used. Ultimately
    will like pull unimplemented items out into separate class making the
    waffle implemented portion completely obvious.

* use explicit reference such as this or static references
* use proper java variable instance naming (ie not underscores preceding
name)
* use proper java case on static final variables such as LOGGER
* removed unnecessary definitions of remoteHost, remoteAddr, and
remotePort shadowed from tomcat super classes under test cases.  Renamed
session to httpSession as that shadow was separate and needed to be
defined separately.
* updated tomcat 7 to 7.0.55
* started adding comments in tomcat 8 and will follow in others
regarding pieces of tomcat not actually implemented within test cases in
an effort to make it more obvious to what is being used.  Ultimately
will like pull unimplemented items out into separate class making the
waffle implemented portion completely obvious.
@dblock
Copy link
Collaborator

dblock commented Aug 2, 2014

This is very nice, good work.

As a small recommendation I suggest making small commits for each one of the line items as you go along. This way the history is preserved in git and not just in PRs.

dblock added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2014
@dblock dblock merged commit 912f06e into Waffle:master Aug 2, 2014
@hazendaz
Copy link
Member Author

hazendaz commented Aug 2, 2014

Sure. I will adjust my strategy. That makes a lot of sense. I had a feeling this was getting a little overwhelming and hard to follow. I’ll definitely make sure to use smaller commits.

Thanks,

Jeremy

From: Daniel Doubrovkine (dB.) @dblockdotorg [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2014 3:08 PM
To: dblock/waffle
Cc: Jeremy Landis
Subject: Re: [waffle] More Quality Cleanup (#126)

This is very nice, good work.

As a small recommendation I suggest making small commits for each one of the line items as you go along. This way the history is preserved in git and not just in PRs.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #126 (comment) . https://github.com/notifications/beacon/975267__eyJzY29wZSI6Ik5ld3NpZXM6QmVhY29uIiwiZXhwaXJlcyI6MTcyMjYyNTY5NSwiZGF0YSI6eyJpZCI6Mzg2NjY4Mzl9fQ==--34b7def1fcf096327c8600cd8fd319c78cac548e.gif

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants