-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 185
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Drop old branches #134
Comments
We used to have branches for various versions of thirdparty servers before Waffle was combined 1.5. The only reason to keep those would be to preserve the history, but it has been 2 years, so maybe it's time, go for it. |
Was the history not pulled into the master when those became part of the master? It seems they were based on indications that they are all around 1 commit in difference. That 1 commit usually was some marker noting the old codeplex location. So seems the history is on the master but maybe it wasn’t. If it was on the master, then it will still be there from what I understand. From: Daniel Doubrovkine (dB.) @dblockdotorg [mailto:[email protected]] We used to have branches for various versions of thirdparty servers before Waffle was combined 1.5. The only reason to keep those would be to preserve the history, but it has been 2 years, so maybe it's time, go for it. — |
I think you are right, those branches did get merged with history around 1.5. Again, just kill everything you don't think is necessary. |
Great! Thanks. From: Daniel Doubrovkine (dB.) @dblockdotorg [mailto:[email protected]] I think you are right, those branches did get merged with history around 1.5. Again, just kill everything you don't think is necessary. — |
Removed old branches that were merged into master over time. |
I've reviewed all the old branches on waffle currently. All could be deleted with exception of the one trying to solve issue #59. I realize most of these came originally from the old codeplex site but there really is no mirror over there any longer since this is only being worked on github. So I propose that we drop all those old branches that are no longer necessary. There is no code in those that isn't already on the current code base with exception of the #59 that may or may not still be needed depending on outcome of further investigation there. I can certainly remove the old branches provided the go-ahead is given.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: