Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: onchain quoter batch param differed by optimistic cached routes #570

Conversation

jsy1218
Copy link
Member

@jsy1218 jsy1218 commented May 10, 2024

  • What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
    chore

  • What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
    We don't differ gas batch param by intent-quote vs caching-quote.

  • What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
    We will differentiate

  • Other information:

@jsy1218 jsy1218 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 10, 2024 15:41
* return gas used from multicall in case of a failed quote

* fix compiling error

* add target contract address to the failed multicall debug log

* also return gas limit
@jsy1218 jsy1218 force-pushed the jsy1218/onchain-quoter-batch-param-differed-by-optimistic-cached-routes branch from aca7fdc to 44b1d69 Compare May 10, 2024 15:42
Copy link

graphite-app bot commented May 10, 2024

Graphite Automations

"Request reviewers once CI passes on smart-order-router repo" took an action on this PR • (05/10/24)

3 reviewers were added and 1 assignee was added to this PR based on 's automation.

Copy link
Member Author

jsy1218 commented May 10, 2024

Merge activity

  • May 10, 2:50 PM EDT: @jsy1218 started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.
  • May 10, 2:50 PM EDT: Graphite couldn't merge this PR because it failed optional checks and "ignore optional checks" was not selected.

@jsy1218 jsy1218 merged commit e339c03 into main May 10, 2024
20 of 24 checks passed
@jsy1218 jsy1218 deleted the jsy1218/onchain-quoter-batch-param-differed-by-optimistic-cached-routes branch May 10, 2024 18:54
@jsy1218 jsy1218 mentioned this pull request May 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants