Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 1, 2022. It is now read-only.

computation of geospatial coverage altitude? #25

Closed
emontgomery-usgs opened this issue Jun 17, 2013 · 2 comments
Closed

computation of geospatial coverage altitude? #25

emontgomery-usgs opened this issue Jun 17, 2013 · 2 comments

Comments

@emontgomery-usgs
Copy link

Folks-

Not sure if this is a THREDDS issue or not, but please steer me in the right direction.

For an adcp file with samples between 6 and -0.5 (6 meters deep to just above the surface), I think I have positive-down in the right place in my ncml, but the geospatial metadata doesn't seem to pick up on it.

For my files with multiple depths, I put this in my geospatial coverage (metadata inherited=true):

6.044800
6.5
meters

Then have this in my depth variable:



but end up with the wrong thing (Altitude should be 6.0488 to -0.5 (positive is DOWN)) in geospatial bounds on the dataset page:
GeospatialCoverage:
Longitude: 13.7566 to 13.7566 degrees_west
Latitude: 43.296902 to 43.296902 degrees_north
Altitude: 6.0448 to 12.5448 meters (positive is up)

for an example see: http:https://geoport-dev.whoi.edu/thredds/ts/EUROSTRATAFORM.html?dataset=EUROSTRATAFORM/7011adc-a_2d.nc

Do I need to tell the geospatial bounds metadata that positive is down?

Thanks for any suggestions!
Best, Ellyn

@madry
Copy link
Contributor

madry commented Jun 17, 2013

Ellyn,

Can you send me one of the original files, or turn on http access for
the Eurostrataform Pasta Experiment? If you send me your NcML/catalog
snippet, I'll see what happens when I put it in a TDS.

Thanks,
Lansing

On 6/17/2013 2:02 PM, Ellyn Montgomery wrote:

Folks-

Not sure if this is a THREDDS issue or not, but please steer me in the
right direction.

For an adcp file with samples between 6 and -0.5 (6 meters deep to
just above the surface), I think I have positive-down in the right
place in my ncml, but the geospatial metadata doesn't seem to pick up
on it.

For my files with multiple depths, I put this in my geospatial
coverage (metadata inherited=true):

6.044800
6.5
meters

Then have this in my depth variable:

but end up with the wrong thing (Altitude should be 6.0488 to -0.5
(positive is DOWN)) in geospatial bounds on the dataset page:
GeospatialCoverage:
Longitude: 13.7566 to 13.7566 degrees_west
Latitude: 43.296902 to 43.296902 degrees_north
Altitude: 6.0448 to 12.5448 meters (positive is up)

for an example see:
http:https://geoport-dev.whoi.edu/thredds/ts/EUROSTRATAFORM.html?dataset=EUROSTRATAFORM/7011adc-a_2d.nc

Do I need to tell the geospatial bounds metadata that positive is down?

Thanks for any suggestions!
Best, Ellyn


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#25.

@dopplershift
Copy link
Member

Closing because there been no response for over 1 year. Feel free to re-open if this is still an issue.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants