Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Appveyor support and minor ERS fix #27

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 17, 2015
Merged

Appveyor support and minor ERS fix #27

merged 7 commits into from
Mar 17, 2015

Conversation

cpaulik
Copy link
Collaborator

@cpaulik cpaulik commented Mar 10, 2015

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.14%) to 51.23% when pulling 4885565 on appveyor-support into b479417 on develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 51.37% when pulling 98979ca on appveyor-support into b479417 on develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.14%) to 51.23% when pulling 98979ca on appveyor-support into b479417 on develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 51.37% when pulling 6ac6daa on appveyor-support into b479417 on develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.14%) to 51.23% when pulling ab22aea on appveyor-support into b479417 on develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 51.37% when pulling 43000eb on appveyor-support into b479417 on develop.

cpaulik added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2015
@cpaulik
Merge pull request #27 from TUW-GEO/appveyor-support
f51c87a 
Appveyor support and minor ERS fix
@cpaulik cpaulik merged commit f51c87a into develop Mar 17, 2015
@cpaulik cpaulik deleted the appveyor-support branch March 17, 2015 16:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@cpaulik @coveralls