Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BugFix] Fix complex type timestamp timezone in parquet scanner #50448

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 30, 2024

Conversation

wyb
Copy link
Contributor

@wyb wyb commented Aug 30, 2024

Why I'm doing:

read timestamp in complex type does not use timezone, and session variable time_zone is not work

What I'm doing:

fix this

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.3
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0
    • 2.5

@wyb wyb requested a review from a team as a code owner August 30, 2024 05:06
@github-actions github-actions bot added the 3.3 label Aug 30, 2024
@mergify mergify bot assigned wyb Aug 30, 2024
Copy link

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 4 / 4 (100.00%)

file detail

path covered_line new_line coverage not_covered_line_detail
🔵 be/src/exec/parquet_scanner.cpp 4 4 100.00% []

@wyb wyb merged commit 44aa1be into StarRocks:main Aug 30, 2024
59 checks passed
Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.3

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.3 label Aug 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Aug 30, 2024

backport branch-3.3

✅ Backports have been created

@wyb
Copy link
Contributor Author

wyb commented Sep 2, 2024

https://github.com/Mergifyio backport branch-3.2

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 2, 2024

backport branch-3.2

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2024
va-os-commits pushed a commit to va-os-commits/starrocks that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
renzhimin7 pushed a commit to renzhimin7/starrocks that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants