Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes for entering Awesome Awesome #108

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 8, 2018

Conversation

luanpotter
Copy link
Contributor

This list is awesome, @Solido (pun intended)!

I've seen some of your previous effort towards meeting all the silly rules to entering the Awesome Awesome, and I understand you might be frustrated about the futility of some things they say.

But I think it'd be very good for this awesome and for the Flutter community as a whole to get a place there, so I took the liberty to fill (I think) all their remaining requirements, so, when you merge, I hope we can re-open that request.

I'm prepared to fix any other complaints they might have afterwards (if they still do) ;)

@Solido
Copy link
Owner

Solido commented Jun 8, 2018

We may try to enter the list again my only concern is we may have to go to far and remove so much stuff that it hurt our readers. I prefer having a huge video introduction than a huge Awesome Logo like they do to promote the list.

From your point of view what's the interest to enter the list if we can update the content as we want in the future ?

Thanks !

@Solido Solido merged commit 6a4d79c into Solido:master Jun 8, 2018
@luanpotter
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think the reason to enter the list is to make the list itself more famous and also to increase visibility of the Flutter platform, which is something I'd like very much to see happening.

However, I agree that we should not mess with the content with that regard -- if there is an item that they require to remove from list in order to enter, then I think that's absurd. While the changes were mostly syntax, placement and consistent, I think it's worth it. So let's see what they say now, and if anything we can decide to remain independent.

Also, from what I noticed, after entering, there doesn't seem to exist a such rigorous process, we can still add awesome items, right? We just need to keep following the pattern, but it's easier to fix each new item, now that the rest is consistent.

Again, if it messes with your decision on what stuff should be added, I certainly think it's no longer a noble goal ;)

@Solido
Copy link
Owner

Solido commented Jun 8, 2018

There's already some important items that where removed like the video showing the growth of the git repo. Let's see how it goes with the process. Thank you for your updates on the project, they have been integrated with the generation tools that should help maintain consistency and offers new features in the future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants