feat: silent give command

[ybw0014]

Description

Adds a silent_give command to give items to players without notifying them.

Proposed changes

Move the logics to AbstractGiveCommand, and pass arguments to determine whether the receiver should get a notification.

Related Issues (if applicable)

Discord suggestion 2579

Checklist

• I have fully tested the proposed changes and promise that they will not break everything into chaos.
• I have also tested the proposed changes in combination with various popular addons and can confirm my changes do not break them.
• I have made sure that the proposed changes do not break compatibility across the supported Minecraft versions (1.16.* - 1.20.*).
• I followed the existing code standards and didn't mess up the formatting.
• I did my best to add documentation to any public classes or methods I added.
• I have added Nonnull and Nullable annotations to my methods to indicate their behaviour for null values
• I added sufficient Unit Tests to cover my code.

[github-actions]

Pro Tip!
You can help us label your Pull Requests by using the following branch naming convention next time you create a pull request. ❤️

Branch naming convention	Label
feature/**	🎈 Feature
fix/**	✨ Fix
chore/**	🧹 Chores
api/**	🔧 API
performance/**	💡 Performance Optimization
compatibility/**	🤝 Compatibility

---

If your changes do not fall into any of these categories, don't worry. You can just ignore this message in that case! 👀

[github-actions]

Slimefun preview build

A Slimefun preview build is available for testing!
Commit: a1bd9c8a

https://preview-builds.walshy.dev/download/Slimefun/4196/a1bd9c8a

Note: This is not a supported build and is only here for the purposes of testing.
Do not run this on a live server and do not report bugs anywhere but this PR!

[JustAHuman-xD]

Is there a reason for the class being abstract here? if all you are changing is the constructer arguments then the class doesn't need to be abstract, just have a give command that's created twice with the corresponding silent and not silent arguments. unless I'm missing something anyways

[ybw0014]

Is there a reason for the class being abstract here? if all you are changing is the constructer arguments then the class doesn't need to be abstract, just have a give command that's created twice with the corresponding silent and not silent arguments. unless I'm missing something anyways

to keep the SlimefunSubCommands format consistent.

[JustAHuman-xD]

to keep the SlimefunSubCommands format consistent.

Hmmmm, like fair but also aaaaaa

[ybw0014]

Hmmmm, like fair but also aaaaaa

I would like to see others' opinions.