Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pre-commit fixes for SciTools/test-iris-imagehash#87 #88

Merged

Conversation

trexfeathers
Copy link
Contributor

@trexfeathers trexfeathers commented Jun 6, 2024

Note there are other debates to be had about whether this repository continues, and why the tests aren't currently running, but those definitely feel out of scope here.

@ESadek-MO ESadek-MO self-assigned this Jun 27, 2024
@ESadek-MO ESadek-MO self-requested a review June 27, 2024 14:51
Copy link

@ESadek-MO ESadek-MO left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We've spoken about commas; I've not found a reason to keep them. Otherwise looks good.

pyproject.toml Show resolved Hide resolved
@ESadek-MO ESadek-MO merged commit e93fc95 into SciTools:repo-sync/github/default Jun 28, 2024
2 checks passed
trexfeathers added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2024
* 👁 TEMPLATE DEVIATIONS: synced local '.pre-commit-config.yaml' with remote 'templates/.pre-commit-config.yaml'

* Remove the file filter for test-iris-imagehash

* Pre-commit fixes for #87 (#88)

* Pre-commit auto-fixes.

* Remove references to Black.

* Copy Iris config for numpydoc.

* Ruff compliant.

* Apply repo-review exceptions from Iris-grib.

* Repo-review compliant.

* More numpydoc compliance.

* Better repo-review compliance.

* Remove comment.

---------

Co-authored-by: scitools-ci[bot] <107775138+scitools-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Yeo <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants