Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add image for example load_nemo #24

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 17, 2019

Conversation

bjlittle
Copy link
Member

This PR supports Iris PR 3398, which adds the new load_nemo example to the gallery.

@@ -20,7 +22,7 @@ def create_v4_images_listfile(search_dirpath=V4_DIR, filespec='*.png',
output_filepath=V4_LISTFILE_PATH):
file_names = get_v4_imagefile_names(search_dirpath, filespec)
with open(output_filepath, 'w') as f_out:
for file_name in file_names:
for file_name in sorted(file_names):
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorting ensures that a newly generated v4_files_listing.txt file is ordered, making PR changes easier to review - otherwise it's not guaranteed that the same v4_files_listing.txt can be recreated.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will make things much easier!

@bjlittle
Copy link
Member Author

@lbdreyer Can I tempt you again with this PR? 😉

@lbdreyer
Copy link
Member

A bit hard to review with all the changes to the listing, now that they are being sorted. But hopefully future reviews will be easier now the sort is in place!
I think this is good to go!
Thanks @bjlittle !

@lbdreyer lbdreyer merged commit 693fb9a into SciTools:gh-pages Sep 17, 2019
@bjlittle
Copy link
Member Author

@lbdreyer Awesome, thanks! 😄

@bjlittle bjlittle deleted the add-example-load-nemo-image branch October 16, 2019 13:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants