Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ci-skip] Badges #97

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2022
Merged

[ci-skip] Badges #97

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2022

Conversation

ArnoStrouwen
Copy link
Member

Is there/should there be a badge for doc code coverage?

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

there should be, and that's the codecov one?

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 7322892 into SciML:master Aug 26, 2022
@ArnoStrouwen
Copy link
Member Author

I guess I misunderstand what documentation code coverage means.
I thought it meant how much of the code was covered in the documentation examples.
This in contrast to code coverage in the test, in which case it makes sense to have 2 badges for them.
But I think it is something else.

@ArnoStrouwen ArnoStrouwen deleted the patch-1 branch August 26, 2022 16:04
@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

What is meant is that doctests submit coverage to CodeCov after running, to put things covered by test tutorials into the coverage statistics.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants