chore: bump version

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml

@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ body:
  label: Library Version
  description: Specify the version of the library where you encountered the issue
  options:
- - 0.10.3 (latest)
+ - 0.11.0 (latest)
+ - 0.10.3
  - 0.10.2
  - 0.10.1
  - 0.10.0

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Options `--directory /tmp --resize 500x200 --filter lanczos3 mozjpeg --quality 8
 One image [from here](https://github.com/lovell/sharp/blob/main/test/fixtures/2569067123_aca715a2ee_o.jpg):
 
 ```
-Benchmark 1: rimage-0.11.0-next
+Benchmark 1: rimage-0.11.0-next.0
  Time (mean ± σ): 48.6 ms ± 1.3 ms [User: 43.9 ms, System: 8.4 ms]
  Range (min … max): 46.7 ms … 53.3 ms 59 runs
 
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Benchmark 3: squoosh-cli
  Range (min … max): 738.0 ms … 829.5 ms 10 runs
 
 Summary
- rimage-0.11.0-next ran
+ rimage-0.11.0-next.0 ran
  14.23 ± 0.39 times faster than rimage-0.10.3
  15.65 ± 0.74 times faster than squoosh-cli
 ```
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ Options `--directory /tmp --resize 500x200 --filter lanczos3 mozjpeg --quality 8
 Multiple images in parallel [from here](https://github.com/lovell/sharp/tree/main/test/fixtures) (only jpg):
 
 ```
-Benchmark 1: rimage-0.11.0-next
+Benchmark 1: rimage-0.11.0-next.0
  Time (mean ± σ): 177.2 ms ± 4.6 ms [User: 999.5 ms, System: 38.7 ms]
  Range (min … max): 169.3 ms … 184.7 ms 17 runs
 
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Benchmark 2: rimage-0.10.3
  Range (min … max): 26.045 s … 27.297 s 10 runs
 
 Summary
- rimage-0.11.0-next ran
+ rimage-0.11.0-next.0 ran
  148.99 ± 4.31 times faster than rimage-0.10.3
 ```
 

Cargo.toml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 [package]
 name = "rimage"
-version = "0.11.0-next"
+version = "0.11.0-next.0"
 edition = "2021"
 description = "Optimize images natively with best-in-class codecs"
 license = "MIT OR Apache-2.0"