Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Support ignore boxes in nanodet head #480

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 22, 2022
Merged

[Feature] Support ignore boxes in nanodet head #480

merged 7 commits into from
Dec 22, 2022

Conversation

zero0kiriyu
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #480 (128955d) into main (ad410c2) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 54.54%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #480      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.71%   74.69%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          70       70              
  Lines        4572     4600      +28     
  Branches      777      716      -61     
==========================================
+ Hits         3416     3436      +20     
- Misses        971      974       +3     
- Partials      185      190       +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 74.69% <54.54%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
nanodet/data/dataset/coco.py 74.44% <0.00%> (+1.61%) ⬆️
nanodet/model/head/assigner/atss_assigner.py 85.13% <25.00%> (-7.41%) ⬇️
nanodet/model/head/assigner/dsl_assigner.py 83.33% <28.57%> (+1.51%) ⬆️
nanodet/data/transform/warp.py 84.44% <50.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
nanodet/model/head/nanodet_plus_head.py 73.87% <76.47%> (+0.97%) ⬆️
nanodet/model/head/gfl_head.py 86.00% <80.00%> (-0.55%) ⬇️
nanodet/model/loss/utils.py 74.07% <0.00%> (-3.71%) ⬇️
... and 1 more

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants