Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Project view configurable #4257

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2024
Merged

Project view configurable #4257

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2024

Conversation

Crashillo
Copy link
Member

@Crashillo Crashillo commented Sep 25, 2024

Closes https://github.com/PopulateTools/issues/issues/2005

✌️ What does this PR do?

Treats the status variable as another custom field, that is, is moved from the native fields block to the custom fields block. Allows to set an order (and a filter) for the projects fields displayed. In order toachieve this, a new configuration variable is included: show_project_fields, accepts an array of the field names.

https://mataro.gobify.net/planes/pla-de-mandat/2023/proyecto/20949

Production plan sites:

📖 Does this PR require updating the documentation?

  • new site configuration variable?

https://gobierto.readme.io/docs/planificiacion#configuraci%C3%B3n

@Crashillo Crashillo changed the title show status as customField Project show configurable Sep 25, 2024
@Crashillo Crashillo changed the title Project show configurable Project view configurable Sep 25, 2024
@Crashillo Crashillo marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2024 14:04
Copy link
Contributor

@aramollis aramollis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

works as expected

@Crashillo Crashillo merged commit 2484979 into master Sep 25, 2024
19 checks passed
@Crashillo Crashillo deleted the 2005-status-custom-field branch September 25, 2024 14:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants