refactor(app): update sectionList text to reflect new design

[jerader]

closes #9159

Overview

This PR updates the text on the steps in sectionList

Changelog

• utilize i18n plural to change text depending on if the protocol uses 1 or 2 pipettes
• update component and test

Review requests

• I only checked how it looks visually when you need only 1 pipette (see above photo). Check to see how it looks if you need 2 pipettes.
• makes sure it matches the design (see ticket for details)

Risk assessment

low, behind ff

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #9223 (e44e344) into edge (03e3c55) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             edge    #9223   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.89%   74.89%           
=======================================
  Files        1882     1882           
  Lines       50167    50167           
  Branches     4938     4938           
=======================================
  Hits        37571    37571           
  Misses      11704    11704           
  Partials      892      892           

Flag	Coverage Δ
app	70.63% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[b-cooper]

Looks good to me 👍

[shlokamin]

the use of count as a pluralizer here is confusing to me. we tell i18n to pluralize the entry when there the user is in a two pipette flow, but it's hard to tell what that actually maps to. the pluralizer is really meant to change things like one item to two items. here we aren't actually pluralizing anything (as far as I can tell.). also it looks like depending on whether we're in a 1 pipette or 2 pipette workflow, the wording should be as follows:

1 pip flow:
Step 1: Check tipracks with Pipette and pick up a tip
// you actually have: Check tip racks with {{primary_mount}} Pipette and pick up a tip
Step 2: Check remaining labware with Pipette and tip
// you actually have: Check remaining labware with {{secondary_mount}} and tip
2 pip flow:
Step 2: Check tipracks with Right Pipette and pick up a tip
// you actually have: Check tip racks with {{primary_mount}} Pipette
Step 3: Check remaining labware with Right Pipette and tip
// this one looks correct

tbh i am confused because the image and text on the ticket say 2 different things... @emilywools is what jethary has here what you intended?

[jerader]

Oh good call, I was following what the images show in the ticket @emilywools please LMK if that's correct?

@shlokamin Also, I'm confused as to how this isn't a way to use count as a pluralizer? We have several other areas in the repo where i18n plural is used to completely change the text: for example in protocol_setup.json there is:

"module_setup_step_description": "Plug in and turn on the required module via the OT-2 USB Port. Place the module as shown in the deck map."

"module_setup_step_description_plural": "Plug in and turn on the required modules via the OT-2 USB Ports. Place the modules as shown in the deck map."

[shlokamin]

the example you have above looks like it's just changing module => modules and port => ports, which makes sense since its just pluralizing the subject nouns.

this is slightly different:

  "primary_pipette_tipracks_section": "Check tip racks with {{primary_mount}} Pipette and pick up a tip",
  "primary_pipette_tipracks_section_plural": "Check tip racks with {{primary_mount}} Pipette",

we're not really pluralizing anything here, so when I read this, I'm sort of confused as to what the singular/plural text for primary_pipette_tipracks_section means. we don't change anything from singular to plural, we're really just adding and pick up tip when it's "singular"

[shlokamin]

screenshot for 2 pipettes:

[emilywools]

hey @jerader Jethary, I think overall what you have is correct, but Shlok grabbed a 2-pipette workflow screenshot, and the "pick up a tip" belongs with step 2, not step 1. Does that make sense?

[jerader]

hey @jerader Jethary, I think overall what you have is correct, but Shlok grabbed a 2-pipette workflow screenshot, and the "pick up a tip" belongs with step 2, not step 1. Does that make sense?

Not the same protocol that Shlok used but fixed the issue. Here is what it looks like now with 2 pipettes: @emilywools @shlokamin

[emilywools]

this looks good to me, thank you!

[shlokamin]

🚢