refactor(api): Add GEB tiprack definition to default containers

[Laura-Danielle]

overview

GEB tiprack needs to be added to default containers for customers who are not utilizing
split_definitions feature flag. Also, there was a typo in the docs about the GEB tiprack definition
name.

changelog

• Add GEB tiprack definition into 'default-containers'
• Edit docs to reflect correct definition name

review requests

[umbhau]

@Laura-Danielle should we call this the opentrons-tiprack-300ul?

Assuming this is for the custom tipracks GEB manufactures for Opentrons, not the off-the-shelf GEB tipracks.

[Laura-Danielle]

@umbhau I am not opposed to changing the name. @btmorr @pantslakz @howisthisnamenottakenyet thoughts?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1658 into edge will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             edge    #1658      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   34.62%   34.64%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         340      343       +3     
  Lines        5533     5813     +280     
==========================================
+ Hits         1916     2014      +98     
- Misses       3617     3799     +182

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
protocol-designer/src/file-data/actions.js	50% <0%> (-50%)	⬇️
...-designer/src/top-selectors/well-contents/index.js	26.31% <0%> (-13.69%)	⬇️
protocol-designer/src/file-data/reducers/index.js	29.41% <0%> (-12.26%)	⬇️
...esigner/src/components/IngredientPropertiesForm.js	0% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
...rotocol-designer/src/components/IngredientsList.js	0% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
app-shell/lib/menu.js	0% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
...rotocol-designer/src/containers/IngredientsList.js	0% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
...esigner/src/containers/IngredientPropertiesForm.js	0% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
app/src/components/ToolTip.js	0% <0%> (ø)
protocol-designer/src/file-data/index.js	0% <0%> (ø)
... and 7 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b7cd58c...84831dc. Read the comment docs.

[howisthisnamenottakenyet]

Not opposed to more specific naming.

[btmorr]

opentrons-tiprack-300ul is fine. Either one works for me, let's just change the documentation to match whatever we decide on

[andySigler]

The more specific naming, in my opinion, the better. If the tip-rack has a part number, that should be either in the name, or specified some other way. It is 100% conceivable that we will have a rev2 or even totally different design of the opentrons-tiprack-300ul

[btmorr]

🍘

[btmorr]

Pending CI fix

[mcous]

@andySigler raises a really good point about labware revisions. I'm ok with this PR going in (especially to fix up OT2 docs weirdness) but we should discuss how new versions of a given definition are going to play out

[Laura-Danielle]

@mcous @andySigler I think that's definitely something to keep in mind moving forward. We should definitely have a discussion about how to handle revisions/model numbers and where they live.

[pantslakz]

happy we're ridding of GEB in place of Opentrons