feat(hardware-testing): liquid sense testing script #14807
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… adjust for tip variation
…on to make it more readable
This reverts commit faf764a0c18a21e91c41d520921ece47edb97421.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## edge #14807 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 67.24% 60.10% -7.15%
==========================================
Files 2495 189 -2306
Lines 71254 10459 -60795
Branches 8937 0 -8937
==========================================
- Hits 47918 6286 -41632
+ Misses 21235 4173 -17062
+ Partials 2101 0 -2101
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
sfoster1
approved these changes
Apr 4, 2024
| @@ -2584,7 +2584,6 @@ async def liquid_probe( | |||
| probe=probe if probe else InstrumentProbeType.PRIMARY, | |||
| ) | |||
| end_pos = await self.gantry_position(mount, refresh=True) | |||
| await self.move_to(mount, probe_start_pos) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
let's note this change a little more prominently in the pr description or better yet make it a separate pr please
Carlos-fernandez
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
<!-- Thanks for taking the time to open a pull request! Please make sure you've read the "Opening Pull Requests" section of our Contributing Guide: https://github.com/Opentrons/opentrons/blob/edge/CONTRIBUTING.md#opening-pull-requests To ensure your code is reviewed quickly and thoroughly, please fill out the sections below to the best of your ability! --> # Overview This PR adds a new testing script that allows us to test all kinds of variations of the liquid-sense routine it adds some additional features in the hardware control layer to change up output options to during the probe so we can gate using the buffer-on-pipette feature to a firmware version flag, since that feature has to be compiled in separately <!-- Use this section to describe your pull-request at a high level. If the PR addresses any open issues, please tag the issues here. --> # Test Plan <!-- Use this section to describe the steps that you took to test your Pull Request. If you did not perform any testing provide justification why. OT-3 Developers: You should default to testing on actual physical hardware. Once again, if you did not perform testing against hardware, justify why. Note: It can be helpful to write a test plan before doing development Example Test Plan (HTTP API Change) - Verified that new optional argument `dance-party` causes the robot to flash its lights, move the pipettes, then home. - Verified that when you omit the `dance-party` option the robot homes normally - Added protocol that uses `dance-party` argument to G-Code Testing Suite - Ran protocol that did not use `dance-party` argument and everything was successful - Added unit tests to validate that changes to pydantic model are correct --> # Changelog <!-- List out the changes to the code in this PR. Please try your best to categorize your changes and describe what has changed and why. Example changelog: - Fixed app crash when trying to calibrate an illegal pipette - Added state to API to track pipette usage - Updated API docs to mention only two pipettes are supported IMPORTANT: MAKE SURE ANY BREAKING CHANGES ARE PROPERLY COMMUNICATED --> # Review requests <!-- Describe any requests for your reviewers here. --> # Risk assessment <!-- Carefully go over your pull request and look at the other parts of the codebase it may affect. Look for the possibility, even if you think it's small, that your change may affect some other part of the system - for instance, changing return tip behavior in protocol may also change the behavior of labware calibration. Identify the other parts of the system your codebase may affect, so that in addition to your own review and testing, other people who may not have the system internalized as much as you can focus their attention and testing there. --> --------- Co-authored-by: caila-marashaj <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
This PR adds a new testing script that allows us to test all kinds of variations of the liquid-sense routine
it adds some additional features in the hardware control layer to change up output options to during the probe so we can gate using the buffer-on-pipette feature to a firmware version flag, since that feature has to be compiled in separately
Test Plan
Changelog
Review requests
Risk assessment