Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Labware Calibration on Module #3775

Closed
1 task
umbhau opened this issue Jul 23, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3800
Closed
1 task

Labware Calibration on Module #3775

umbhau opened this issue Jul 23, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3800
Assignees
Labels
api Affects the `api` project feature Ticket is a feature request / PR introduces a feature

Comments

@umbhau
Copy link

umbhau commented Jul 23, 2019

As an Opentrons Thermocycler user, I would like my labware-on-module calibrations to be independent of calibrations for labware directly on the deck.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Labware calibrations for labware stacked on top of a module should be independent of labware placed directly on the deck
@umbhau umbhau added feature Ticket is a feature request / PR introduces a feature api Affects the `api` project labels Jul 23, 2019
@b-cooper b-cooper self-assigned this Jul 26, 2019
b-cooper added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2019
Separate calibration will now be required for instances of the same labware that exist in a given
protocol with a different direct parent type (e.g. 'slot', 'thermocycler', 'Magnetic Module'...)

Closes #3775
b-cooper added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 31, 2019
)

Separate calibration will now be required for instances of the same labware that exist in a given
protocol with a different direct parent type (e.g. 'slot', 'thermocycler', 'Magnetic Module'...)

Closes #3775
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api Affects the `api` project feature Ticket is a feature request / PR introduces a feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants