Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use old operation name as default for new name in rename_operation_ha… #1924

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 24, 2023
Merged

Use old operation name as default for new name in rename_operation_ha… #1924

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 24, 2023

Conversation

joernu76
Copy link
Member

Use old operation name as default for new name in rename_operation_handler

Purpose of PR?:

Fixes #1921

Checklist:

  • Bug fix. Fixes rename operation tedious #1921
  • New feature (Non-API breaking changes that adds functionality)
  • PR Title follows the convention of <type>: <subject>
  • Commit has unit tests

@ReimarBauer ReimarBauer merged commit 9f43fd8 into develop Aug 24, 2023
4 checks passed
@ReimarBauer ReimarBauer deleted the i1921 branch August 24, 2023 05:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ReimarBauer ReimarBauer ReimarBauer approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rename operation tedious
2 participants
@joernu76 @ReimarBauer