Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding swagger-validation under Node section #96

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2014
Merged

Adding swagger-validation under Node section #96

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2014

Conversation

wonderlic-chrisk
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

webron added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2014
Adding swagger-validation under Node section
@webron webron merged commit 9974eac into OAI:master Aug 16, 2014
@webron
Copy link
Member

webron commented Aug 16, 2014

@wonderlic-chrisk - Thanks for the addition! Could you please send me your email address? We sometime email library developers regarding requests and news.

You can find my email in the google group, or contact me in IRC.

@wonderlic-chrisk
Copy link
Contributor Author

@webron, I have two, [email protected] and [email protected]. The former is mine, whereas the latter is my full team (as I am not the only one who manages our external libraries).

@webron
Copy link
Member

webron commented Aug 17, 2014

@wonderlic-chrisk - are you aware of the Swagger 2.0 specification process?

@wonderlic-chrisk
Copy link
Contributor Author

@webron, I am aware you guys are in the process of making the 2.0 specs. I briefly looked at them on the Wordnik branch to make sure any additional functionality I added didn't appear to be in conflict.

@webron
Copy link
Member

webron commented Aug 17, 2014

I wouldn't rely on the Wordnik branch. There are quite a few changes.

If you're interested, apply at http:https://swagger.wordnik.com/ to get a preview of what's coming. While it's soon going to be public, I believe library and tool developers would benefit from the early access to the new spec.

@wonderlic-chrisk
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cool thanks. I have done so.

fehguy added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants